Directed AI Collaboration

Framework

DAICatic is short for Directed AI Collaboration. It is a method for writing with artificial intelligence in which the writer stays the author and the machine stays an instrument.

Writers who use this method consider AI a tool, not an author.

If you arrived here from the copyright page of a book, that book was written this way.

What The Framework Is

Before drafting begins, the writer sets down what the book will hold: the convictions, the argument, the moral and intellectual commitments the work will be measured against. This happens first, before any machine is involved, and everything afterward is checked against it.

The writer then specifies the voice. Formal or plain. Humor or none. Short sentences or long ones. Where a reader should feel a turn coming.

Then the work cycles through seven passes. Structure is proposed and the writer corrects what has drifted from the point. A draft is produced and the writer rewrites it, adding evidence, counterargument, example, and the texture that comes from having lived something. Sources are located and verified against the actual source rather than accepted as generated, because these systems will invent a citation and sound certain while doing it. Finally the writer reads the whole work against the commitments set at the start and asks whether it still says what was meant.

01

Formation

Settled truths are in the room before a word is written.

Human
02

Direction

What this piece must accomplish, and what it must never betray.

Human
03

Structure

The machine proposes an order, on the writer's leash.

Machine
04

Coherence Check

The writer judges the shape against what was set down first.

Human
05

Expansion

The machine drafts, fluent and, on its own, slightly hollow.

Machine
06

Calibration

The writer adds the conviction the machine could not supply.

Human
07

Integration

The machine smooths the seams. The writer signs off.

Machine

Step 7 doesn't end the process. It hands the wheel back to step 1, for the next piece, the next session, the next paragraph. This repeats, again and again, for as long as the writer is writing.

Three beats are the machine's. Four are yours, and the four that are yours are the ones no tool will ever do for you.

The machine never decides what the book says. It renders, in a voice it has been given, what the writer has already determined.

Why Not Simply Hire A Ghostwriter

The comparison is fair, and it is the one that usually makes the method clear.

Ghostwriting is ordinary and uncontroversial. A great many business books, memoirs, and leadership titles were drafted by someone other than the name on the cover. The credited author sets the direction, sits for interviews, reviews an outline, and responds to chapters as they arrive. Nobody doubts that he is the author. He decided what the book would say and he put his name on it.

This is the same kind of arrangement, with two differences.

The writer is more involved, not less. A ghostwriting client receives finished pages every few weeks and responds to them. Here the writer's hands are on the manuscript continuously, line by line, through every pass.

And the barrier is cost and time. A full-length nonfiction book, drafted by a professional ghostwriter, commonly runs tens of thousands of dollars and takes the better part of a year. For most writers with something worth saying, that is not a choice between two methods. It is a choice between this method and the book not existing.

One more difference worth naming. Ghostwriting is normally covered by a nondisclosure agreement, so the reader is told nothing. This framework requires the opposite. The reader is told on the title page.

About Volume

A writer working this way will produce more than expected, and that number invites suspicion. The suspicion is reasonable, and it deserves a straight answer.

There are two clocks, and the number measures only one of them. The thinking behind a book is usually the work of years or decades: the teaching, the practice, the arguments tested on real audiences, the ideas carried around unwritten because drafting is slow. What this method compresses is the drafting. It does not compress the thinking, and it cannot supply thinking that was never done.

That is also why the framework begins where it does. A writer with nothing settled has nothing to direct with, and the method produces exactly what was put into it.

What Belongs To The Writer

The convictions. The frameworks. The judgment about what deserves a chapter and what deserves a sentence. The voice, which takes years to build and cannot be borrowed from a machine.

What the tool supplies is fluency in a register it has been given. What the writer supplies is everything that makes the register worth reading.

What This Is Not

The mark on a DAICatic book is a disclosure, not a certification. No outside body accredits it, reviews it, or approves it. It does not claim the book is good. It states how the book was made.

The framework is not proposed as a standard for anyone else. It is a working method, published here so that readers of books written this way can see what it involves.

The thinking, the judgments, and the responsibility for every claim in such a book belong to the writer whose name is on it.

I am Steve W. Griffin. I built this framework for my own work, and my books are written this way.